From owner-freebsd-current  Sun May 11 16:31:45 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA18076
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 11 May 1997 16:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA18071
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 11 May 1997 16:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id QAA00480; Sun, 11 May 1997 16:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
To: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no>
cc: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Regression tests (was Re: A 3.0-current SNAP building machine has been found!) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 11 May 1997 19:09:52 +0200."
             <199705111709.TAA06018@bitbox.follo.net> 
Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 16:30:30 -0700
Message-ID: <476.863393430@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Anyway; being able to do a 'make regress' on the entire FreeBSD
> source tree and know all new code and a lot of old code got tested
> would be a _good_ feeling.

It sure would be.  Pity it's such a hard problem to ensure that
everything is still obeying all the right flags and still generating
all the right output. :(

					Jordan