From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 30 04:36:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C8B106566B for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 04:36:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo202.cox.net (eastrmfepo202.cox.net [68.230.241.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E0B8FC12 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 04:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo305.cox.net ([68.230.241.237]) by eastrmfepo202.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20111030043629.EBOF3788.eastrmfepo202.cox.net@eastrmimpo305.cox.net> for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 00:36:29 -0400 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.236]) by eastrmimpo305.cox.net with bizsmtp id qscU1h00155wwzE02scURU; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 00:36:28 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020206.4EACD44C.00EA,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=u0FlMDIURngR7xd/wSngO/gpwPZ2tG8gdPFHMgiLzjI= c=1 sm=1 a=22My0DWCU9gA:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=uAbGmPAyUfLL1M3oYAsfuA==:17 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=TvQ-p7JCAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=cTEq7RPTQHgFwkXS5BEA:9 a=TZGO8iXJD4w9lK32EJEA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=0-QwZ_ux1wEA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=uAbGmPAyUfLL1M3oYAsfuA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9U4aRMI099880 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:36:27 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:36:22 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111029233622.07911997@cox.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ports/161825 linux-f10-flash11 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 04:36:35 -0000 On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 20:05:35 -0500 Adam Vande More wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Rusty Nejdl > wrote: > > > > > > > 2) This doesn't conflict with flash10. > > > > galacticdominator% pkg_info -W > /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so > pkg_info: both linux-f10-flashplugin-10.3r183.10 and > linux-f10-flashplugin-11.0r1.152 claim to have installed > /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so > > /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so was > installed by package linux-f10-flashplugin-10.3r183.10 > Yes, I noticed this, too. Perhaps both ports could be modified to install to /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin${version} (10 or 11) instead? Of course, if version 11 will just wind up superseding version 10, then that's probably not even necessary (myself, I simply uninstalled the older version and reinstalled the new one). And still no sign of those old annoying artifacts! Yes! :-) -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net