From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 9 05:52:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3058337B401 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 05:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-104-32.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8228F43FBF for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 05:52:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4476E66CFB; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 05:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1EA70B71; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 05:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 05:52:51 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Rob Message-ID: <20030609125251.GA92744@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <005d01c32e47$dc282500$a4b826cb@goo> <20030609053525.GA9298@rot13.obsecurity.org> <009901c32e4b$7a52d6a0$a4b826cb@goo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <009901c32e4b$7a52d6a0$a4b826cb@goo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: ADSL: Using mpd(8) for PPPoE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 12:52:54 -0000 --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 03:23:39PM +0930, Rob wrote: > If I can't get mpd(8) to work, I won't have a choice :-) >=20 > The difference between them (as far as I can tell) is that mpd keeps all > the actual packet handling out of userland, so there's less overhead. > I've only got 512k/128k ADSL on a Pentium 166, so it doesn't sound like > ppp(8) will be a bottleneck, based on your experience. I'd expect you'd never even notice the CPU load. I don't. > I'm trying mpd because it looks like the 'cleaner' approach - on the > other hand, it seems to be the minority choice in terms of general > usage. Indeed. Kris --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+5IMiWry0BWjoQKURAqFTAKCHv1Ry9rN125hmFfMCcqWVwA8IEACffnWK ff4Aa3U9JjS96JcX532WKrE= =Raxv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--