From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Mon Feb 6 11:43:36 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF18CD378E for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 11:43:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6B791929 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 11:43:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v16BhZn0079052 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 11:43:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 216760] poor performance on QEMU-KVM host Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 11:43:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rainer@ultra-secure.de X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 11:43:36 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216760 --- Comment #4 from rainer@ultra-secure.de --- Oh, I've never tried that. (freebsd11 ) 0 # dc3dd wipe=3D/dev/md0=20 dc3dd 7.2.641 started at 2017-02-06 12:37:44 +0100 compiled options: command line: dc3dd wipe=3D/dev/md0 device size: 8388608 sectors (probed), 4,294,967,296 bytes sector size: 512 bytes (probed) 4294967296 bytes ( 4 G ) copied ( 100% ), 8 s, 507 M/s=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 input results for pattern `00': 8388608 sectors in output results for device `/dev/md0': 8388608 sectors out dc3dd completed at 2017-02-06 12:37:52 +0100 You're right, memory performance is still sufficient on XenServer. This is real hardware: root@bsd1-build-prod:~ # dc3dd wipe=3D/dev/md0 dc3dd 7.2.641 started at 2017-02-06 12:40:58 +0100 compiled options: command line: dc3dd wipe=3D/dev/md0 device size: 8388608 sectors (probed), 4,294,967,296 bytes sector size: 512 bytes (probed) 4294967296 bytes ( 4 G ) copied ( 100% ), 6 s, 656 M/s=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 input results for pattern `00': 8388608 sectors in output results for device `/dev/md0': 8388608 sectors out dc3dd completed at 2017-02-06 12:41:04 +0100 Though one generation later, so faster RAM, faster CPUs. I'd be happy with that kind of disk-performance loss in a DomU :-( --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=