From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 13 18:25:32 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E608106564A;
	Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:25:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.213.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECEF8FC1C;
	Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:25:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yxk36 with SMTP id 36so860421yxk.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=4IeY5Zt7UcB3AlpHRobvtCe9+MLf4JUKEopYvNSy4uc=;
	b=l/JemTjhDNr0uvVNHxSz5nnIbd75JeI1yuwtN1PeN78BuPIqSBob/fnH+nU8S7Mz5c
	y8ZhVP64+3Jt8Erf8CaZAH+Pw0J+4upWY4+sHzzPGUrpEYg1nyRrsbR1D8aTa9ljcN6P
	duY0whwYhFrTss1dzNuYFztasrkO7g4Dx9tCw=
Received: by 10.231.6.168 with SMTP id 40mr261047ibz.71.1315938331101; Tue, 13
	Sep 2011 11:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: utisoft@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.61.148 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201109131754.p8DHsUXo061135@fire.js.berklix.net>
References: <CADLo83-ZcVAeyznw5DtEHV1tOsBUrZLLR2HJxFjrX_QewpHysA@mail.gmail.com>
	<201109131754.p8DHsUXo061135@fire.js.berklix.net>
From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:25:01 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5ynA2L5mrBBUNDLh3zFJNDMDXYU
Message-ID: <CADLo838gUfrGhOYWYBym=5YiATyJy8r9bNdXCU8gmBjEbrEq6g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Matthias Andree <mandree@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ports-system priorities rant (Re: sysutils/cfs)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:25:32 -0000

On 13 September 2011 18:54, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Reference:
>> From: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
>> Date: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:44:37 +0100
>> Message-id: =A0 <CADLo83-ZcVAeyznw5DtEHV1tOsBUrZLLR2HJxFjrX_QewpHysA@mai=
l.gmail.com>
>
> Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 12 September 2011 22:18, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com> wrote:
>> > Matthias Andree wrote:
>> >> >> An obscure piece of software is undesirable (and shouldn't be port=
ed in
>> >> >> the first place).
>> >> >
>> >> > Bullshit!
>> >>
>> >> I think that suffices. =A0If the discussion is getting emotional, we
>> >> should stop it.
>> >
>> > No. You should stop advocating killing ports, or leave, or be revoked.
>> > FreeBSD would be better without immature ports slaughterers.
>> >
>>
>> Julian,
>>
>> Your arguments have become excessively ad-hominem, and please don't
>> think you're upsetting anyone in the slightest with them.
>>
>> Use rational and technical arguments, or take a break.
>>
>> Chris
>
> Your proposal to remove procmail among others was ridiculous.
> Please consider resigning Chris.
>

Not mine.

Please consider reading mailing lists properly rather than jumping to
conclusions.

Chris