From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 18 09:08:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F168B37B401 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peedub.jennejohn.org (p213.54.231.109.tisdip.tiscali.de [213.54.231.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602F343FA3 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:08:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garyj@jennejohn.org) Received: from peedub.jennejohn.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.jennejohn.org (8.12.9/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5IG8bvI011153; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:08:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from garyj@peedub.jennejohn.org) Message-Id: <200306181608.h5IG8bvI011153@peedub.jennejohn.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Dmitry Sivachenko In-Reply-To: Message from Dmitry Sivachenko <20030618155016.GA88834@fling-wing.demos.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:08:37 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: struct ipc_perm X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 16:08:49 -0000 Dmitry Sivachenko writes: > Hello! > > Is there any reason why struct ipc_perm is not protected by #ifdef _KERNEL > in ipc.h? Is it supposed to be used from userland? > It's needed by ipcs. --- Gary Jennejohn / garyj[at]jennejohn.org gj[at]freebsd.org gj[at]denx.de