From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 7 9: 4:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (ns.mt.sri.com [206.127.79.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D504E15AD0; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 09:04:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA17438; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 10:03:33 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA21766; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 10:03:26 -0600 Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 10:03:26 -0600 Message-Id: <199909071603.KAA21766@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Peter Wemm Cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" , Warner Losh , Warren Welch , Kevin Day , Ugen Antsilevitch , questions@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PCI modems do not work??? In-Reply-To: <19990907100735.8E89B1CA9@overcee.netplex.com.au> References: <19990907100735.8E89B1CA9@overcee.netplex.com.au> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > "Matthew N. Dodd" wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > > > Might be a good time have a sys/dev/sio and have pccard, cardbus, pci > > > and isa attachments there. Yes, I did say cardbus, since I have seen > > > cardbus PCI modems that are NOT winmodems. > > > > And MCA and EISA attachments. > > Well, it seems Bruce objects to this.. I don't know why though. My guess is that he's worried that we'll end up with lots of additional 'indirection' through the system, thus slowing down the ability to service interrupts in a quick manner. Also, don't fast interrupts depend on the ISA bus? Fast interrupts are a requirement for *any* machine to run at a reasonable speed, old/slow or new/fast, it doesn't make any difference. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message