From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Sep 26 17:34:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27B3BEA830 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 17:34:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from az@azsupport.com) Received: from as0.azsupport.com (azsupport.com [209.95.50.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "azsupport.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3A64BB5 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 17:34:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from az@azsupport.com) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:26:37 +0200 From: Andrei To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gfx-next update: drm-4.8-rc2 tagged in drm-next Message-ID: <20160926192637.33f7921b@azsupport.com> In-Reply-To: <1574b8980bc.106a6e9ef306540.4216158444646545056@nextbsd.org> References: <1569231fc12.1189a20c2251388.8699372849515846410@nextbsd.org> <20160920162456.GO8480@rancor.immure.com> <439e20fa-6385-68fb-c97e-24705ebd2f94@nomadlogic.org> <157496f7268.ac5eb5ca278618.8741026532558973404@nextbsd.org> <3FEE7DD3-C408-4398-9F0B-5529B2E7A61F@transactionware.com> <1574b8980bc.106a6e9ef306540.4216158444646545056@nextbsd.org> Organization: azsupport.com X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 17:34:29 -0000 On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 23:58:05 -0700 Matthew Macy wrote: > > Is the plan for drm-next-4.7 make its way into 11-CURRENT at some > > point? > > Eventually all the requisite patches to sys will make it in at which > point drm-next- will become available as a port allowing one to > install the drivers just as one installs xorg and the ddx today. > Keeping it as a port will allow us to decouple freebsd releases from > graphics developments making it possible to support the latest > hardware on near EOL branches. Looks like you just want to push FreeBSD desktop users move to your NextBSD.