From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 27 21:15:37 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6A6A52
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 May 2013 21:15:37 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk)
Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk
 [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506C0DBC
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 May 2013 21:15:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BD4E6A40;
 Mon, 27 May 2013 22:15:32 +0100 (BST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id
 :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=L/KHvmCOgh9/
 XIVKEbNK2xOzTZA=; b=WjLU1oD/ge3Sq71Wb/umPnJk89OEupLntf0Qu+cQCuca
 WHH9VsyvhlA2gDisACu06b6gAyF1NwX0421bFQPD1rEoyye6rSj2RmP06NcYl9bK
 vGK0gdgK9hAjT4RRIYWdaBtGR10X6XPmDyQ49K/3A0oo6NTbJ6DTRkjADn0bHpc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=message-id
 :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=Xk1kGZ
 CP45iS9LFfN53Cwf+Hei8b5CPKejpuGBZ9BeSvlrKoAT4EGIyi/QhCdC3btftgCx
 tTRJ7oTlTX6aA2Q7aZ0VviT9SDLBDvOlODgwt1Wh4vkQtf3eQeM2UJrgCwkjB8kf
 IkGkkCvWbZCmz1BcxqqgUxcc8g0ZIxEiSDiak=
Received: from [IPv6:2a01:348:301:2:ccf1:925a:43f8:4bbc] (unknown
 [IPv6:2a01:348:301:2:ccf1:925a:43f8:4bbc])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C634CE6A01;
 Mon, 27 May 2013 22:15:32 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <51A3CCF1.2080706@cran.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 22:15:29 +0100
From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Is latest portsnap snapshot corrupted?
References: <1369665048044-5815448.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <CAA96eVvU0bU7-RVZE9RviZOrd05qC8q0aRLsJJ7AT=Qk_s6ecQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1369679542074-5815520.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <20130528001340.393804429748c30d19c02ce3@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130528001340.393804429748c30d19c02ce3@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-9; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 21:15:37 -0000

On 27/05/2013 22:13, G=F6k=FEin Akdeniz wrote:
> Ia am not a dev, but portstree snapshot is fixed. Simply run
>
> '# portsnap fetch extract && portsdb -u'
>
> and you will get a fresh snapshot of ports tree.
>

Is '# portsnap fetch update' not sufficient? It seemed to work here.

--=20
Bruce Cran