From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jun 3 19:01:17 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA05876 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 3 Jun 1995 19:01:17 -0700 Received: from kksys.skypoint.net (kksys.skypoint.net [199.86.32.5]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id TAA05845 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 1995 19:00:59 -0700 Received: from starfire.mn.org by kksys.skypoint.net with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #2) id m0sI4xg-0002T5C; Sat, 3 Jun 95 20:58 CDT Received: (from john@localhost) by starfire.mn.org (8.6.8/1.2.1) id UAA27382 for questions@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 3 Jun 1995 20:59:59 -0500 From: John Lind Message-Id: <199506040159.UAA27382@starfire.mn.org> Subject: Windows under FreeBSD To: questions@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD questions) Date: Sat, 3 Jun 1995 20:59:58 -0500 (CDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 432 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I am hearing rumors that WINE may not be going so well. Is anyone working on a different approach -- such as SCO uses -- running actual MS-windows under DOS emulation? It would have all the problems of MS-windows, but at least there wouldn't be as much reverse-engineering of jealously guarded proprietary secrets... John Lind, Starfire Consulting Services E-mail: john@starfire.MN.ORG USnail: PO Box 17247, Mpls MN 55417