Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:06:04 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Chuck Tuffli <chuck_tuffli@agilent.com> Cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SIM as loadable module? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0211191100360.61105-100000@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20021118064805.GA7533@thegrail.rose.agilent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Chuck Tuffli wrote:
> case XPT_PATH_INQ:
> {
> ...
> cpi->bus_id = bus;
Shouldn't this be:
cpi->bus_id = cam_sim_bus(sim);
(of course, I don't know what the type of "bus" is in this context)
> cpi->initiator_id = cpi->max_target + 1;
Does this accurately reflect the card's settings? Some SIMs I've seen do
a device-specific call to read the card's id (in your case,
fcPortGetInfo?). I guess your approach should be necessary in the FC case
since your position in the chain can change when you get a LIP.
The rest looks fine.
-Nate
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0211191100360.61105-100000>