Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:01:35 +0200
From:      Jan Srzednicki <w@expro.pl>
To:        Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: GJournal (hopefully) final patches.
Message-ID:  <20060810200135.GF57857@europa.expro.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20060810194304.GB1345@garage.freebsd.pl>
References:  <20060808195202.GA1564@garage.freebsd.pl> <20060810192152.GE57857@europa.expro.pl> <20060810194304.GB1345@garage.freebsd.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 09:43:04PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 09:21:52PM +0200, Jan Srzednicki wrote:
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I'd happily perform some testing, only if the aac(4) driver would also
> > be patched. I know I can run gjournal w/o the BIO_FLUSH feature, but
> > that would make any performance results rather worthles, wouldn't it?
> 
> From my tests BIO_FLUSH doesn't have huge impact on performance (if at
> all), but I suspect it greatly depends on specific HW.
> 
> Unfortunately I'm not able to implement BIO_FLUSH to all out storage
> drivers. Currently BIO_FLUSH is supported by ata(4) (/dev/a[dr]X),
> da(4) and amr(4).

I see. Does that mean that all CAM-interfaced devices (like asr(4) or
twa(4)) have this feature fully implemented?

-- 
Jan Srzednicki
w@expro.pl




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060810200135.GF57857>