Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 21:34:32 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: timh@tjhawkins.com Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please explain. Message-ID: <20040919023432.GA7981@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <010e01c49df0$a5b79400$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg> References: <010801c49dee$72cc5eb0$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg> <1095546154.671.6.camel@elemental.DashEvil> <010e01c49df0$a5b79400$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Sep 18), timh@tjhawkins.com said: > Your taking it the wrong way, I was simply asking a question to the > developers to confirm this. > > I have standardized on FreeBSD. > > I apologized if I made it seem like I was trolling, not my intention. > > If a business were to standardize on FreeBSD, they would love to know if the > multithreading issues would be fixed completely correctly not just > 'work-arounds'. So far you have only mentioned the word "issues". Do you have a particular one in mind? Maybe your questions would be better answered on the freebsd-threads list. Make sure you include your OS version, threads library you are using, the application you are using, and your specific problem. CC: redirected appropriately. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040919023432.GA7981>