From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 9 22:51:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8064116A403 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:51:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6083013C47E for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:51:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from hymn09.u.washington.edu (hymn09.u.washington.edu [140.142.12.183]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l19MpEdC021624 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:51:15 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn09.u.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.09) with ESMTP id l19MpET5029525 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:51:14 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.55.52.1] by hymn09.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:51:14 PST Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:51:14 -0800 (PST) From: youshi10@u.washington.edu To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070209200309.GH834@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-PMX-Version: 5.3.0.289146, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.0.283055, Antispam-Data: 2007.2.9.143936 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='NO_REAL_NAME 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: pkg_upgrade (was Re: pkg_add does not backtrack, does it?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:51:15 -0000 On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2007-Feb-09 09:43:01 -0800, youshi10@u.washington.edu wrote: >> On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Mike Meyer wrote: >>> Personally, I think that's cool, but it does means it won't go into >>> the base system. Portupgrade would probably be in the base system if >>> it were written in a language in the base system. >> >> Would perl be close enough to count, or would it have to be C/C++? > > Perl was removed in 5.x. Your options are shell, awk and C/C++. > > -- > Peter Jeremy C++ would be it then. -Garrett