From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan  7 15:12:30 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA22961
          for java-outgoing; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 15:12:30 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com ([209.133.7.178])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA22834
          for <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 15:11:58 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com)
Received: (from hasty@localhost)
          by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA01999;
          Wed, 7 Jan 1998 15:11:39 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from hasty)
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 15:11:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Message-Id: <199801072311.PAA01999@rah.star-gate.com>
To: jb@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au, nate@mt.sri.com
Subject: Re: Motif question
Cc: dap@damon.com, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG, gclarkii@main.brewich.com
Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

My focus on the java front is going to be application and not so much
jdk development.

Have no intentions on doing a side port of jdk now that I have the 
diffs to jdk1.1.5.

Does anyone have VisualJ working with jdk1.1.5. It core dumps
with the lesstiff version however with the motif version it justs
hangs.

Also, not sure what to attribute it to however my "native" compiled
version of jdk1.1.5 with motif seems to run faster than the distributed
jdk with lesstif.

	Cheers,
	Amancio