From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Sep 21 23:53:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from guru.mired.org (okc-94-248-46.mmcable.com [24.94.248.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7101037B40A for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:53:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 43563 invoked by uid 100); 22 Sep 2001 06:53:06 -0000 From: Mike Meyer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15276.13650.659971.913724@guru.mired.org> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 01:53:06 -0500 To: Rob B Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: profiled libraries In-Reply-To: <31124905@toto.iv> X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`;h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Rob B types: > Quick couple of questions ... what are profiled libraries, and what is the > benefit/detriment of enabling the NOPROFILE line in /etc/make.conf? The profiled libraries are the standard libraries built with the profiling flags. The benefit of setting NOPROFILE is that you don't spend the time building them. You can also recover the space they use, though that's minor. The detriment is that you can't build profiled versions of any programs you be working on. http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Q: How do you make the gods laugh? A: Tell them your plans. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message