From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 24 15:30:14 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA21289 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 15:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA21284 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 15:30:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA02701; Wed, 24 Jul 1996 16:30:07 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 16:30:07 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199607242230.QAA02701@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams To: hackers@freebsd.org Cc: chag@moneyworld.com Subject: SPAM ( was Re: Chancellor Group) In-Reply-To: References: <199607242150.OAA28669@seagull.rtd.com> Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk My suggestion is to add this person to *ALL* our mailing lists. I think we generate enough traffic to make a dent in is network, and given that he added our address to his list I htink adding him to our lists is only appropriate. Turn-about *IS* fair play! Nate (If that's not acceptable, then a couple of 'well-connected' individuals could forward all freebsd related material to him, thus accomplishing the same task)