From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 28 11:35:57 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA17257 for current-outgoing; Wed, 28 Jun 1995 11:35:57 -0700 Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (sri.MT.net [204.94.231.129]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA17251 ; Wed, 28 Jun 1995 11:35:53 -0700 Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id MAA03494; Wed, 28 Jun 1995 12:37:45 -0600 Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 12:37:45 -0600 Message-Id: <199506281837.MAA03494@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: Garrett Wollman Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , jkh@freebsd.org (Jordan K. Hubbard), FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org (FreeBSD current) Subject: Re: Paul Richards: sysconfig routed setting In-Reply-To: <9506281556.AA00902@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> References: <8337.804273321@whisker.internet-eireann.ie> <199506280552.WAA08478@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> <9506281556.AA00902@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> Reply-To: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams) From: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams) Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > If you are not a router, you have no business > listening to them. HOSTS DO NOT NEED ROUTING INFORMATION. OK, given your assertion's, HOW is machine B supposed to send data to my machine? Ethernet = SLIP/PPP * machine-A<=>machine-B<=>machine-C<*>{internet} ^ * v Nate's box I have two options, and I chose the latter since it's much easier to setup because we have other boxes also sitting off the machines in the network. 1) Have machine A arp for my IP address. 2) Have machine A declare itself a router from my IP address With your assumption, machine B does is not running any routing software, so therefore it does not know to send packets to machine A in order to get to my machine. Note, there are many machines similar to machine B in my network, and I'm not about to add static routes to every one of them to force routing to my machine. Nate