From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 18 23:44:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755FF16A4CE for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 23:44:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB6043D39 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 23:44:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1101.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 60CFD1C00092 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:44:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1101.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4555C1C00085 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:44:37 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050318234437284.4555C1C00085@mwinf1101.wanadoo.fr Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:44:36 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <526177289.20050319004436@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200503181627.06020@harrymail> References: <423AD243.5030601@myunix.net> <200503181627.06020@harrymail> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: MS Exchange server on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 23:44:38 -0000 Emanuel Strobl writes: > ??? Windows is a really good, well maintained standardized and secure piece of > software compared to Exchange. I can't imagine why someone is even > considering exchange when he knows about FreeBSD and it's programs. Exchange is the best choice for intra-organizational e-mail on relatively homogenous internal networks. The many features of Exchange provide a great many relevant and useful advantages in this type of environment. For heterogenous networks and ISPs, Exchange is a poor choice, because most users won't be able to profit from it, and because it is very difficult to implement when many machines in a network are non-Windows (and the Exchange servers themselves _must_ run Windows). -- Anthony