From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 8 11:34:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACB81065671 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 11:34:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from blade2-ext.obspm.fr (blade2-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.186.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A758FC1E for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 11:34:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from freebsd.chezmoi.fr (rubicon.obspm.fr [145.238.193.3]) by blade2-ext.obspm.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/SIO Observatoire de Paris - 15/11/07) with ESMTP id m88BTLI7011627 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:29:22 +0200 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:29:29 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: Wojciech Puchar Message-ID: <20080908112929.GD1204@freebsd.chezmoi.fr> References: <82029aed0809070709n65f67632qcfd4cd3fbdda22f@mail.gmail.com> <20080907232120.2567d5ce.freebsd@edvax.de> <20080908073503.GD34913@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20080908110152.I27211@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080908112346.GB1204@freebsd.chezmoi.fr> <20080908132406.J27739@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20080908132406.J27739@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (blade2-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.186.20]); Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:29:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94/8186/Mon Sep 8 12:00:31 2008 on blade2-ext.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Albert Shih , nicodache , Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LVM2 under FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Albert.Shih@obspm.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:34:48 -0000 Le 08/09/2008 à 13:24:51+0200, Wojciech Puchar a écrit > >>> Yes of course ZFS is very powerful FS, but I'm not very sure it's ready (on > >> > >> you meant very powerrequiring ;) > > > > Yes...but can you say if we have many power (RAM, CPU, etc...) we can use > > if you just want to waste that power - you probably could. I don't very like the «probably» ;-) IMHO ZFS is something amazing, I'm using it on Solaris, and whe you have ~30 To on the server you cannot use UFS or ext3 or anything to need a fsck (event it's not every time, when one of our linux server need to make his fsck that block everything). So I'm very happy the ZFS is on FreeBSD, and I'm waiting when ZFS become stable and could use in production. All of that to say it's not a «waste that power» for me if ZFS working. Regards. -- Albert SHIH SIO batiment 15 Observatoire de Paris Meudon 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26 Heure local/Local time: Lun 8 sep 2008 13:26:32 CEST