From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 15:22:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F4016A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:22:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from opus.cse.buffalo.edu (opus.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D73B43D39 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:22:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from opus.cse.buffalo.edu (opus.cse.buffalo.edu [128.205.32.4]) by opus.cse.buffalo.edu (8.13.3/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2TFMEHG020364; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:22:19 -0500 (EST) From: Ken Smith To: John Polstra In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zsbw0pdLrDQQWozhB5bO" Organization: U. Buffalo CSE Department Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:22:14 -0500 Message-Id: <1112109734.19982.46.camel@opus.cse.buffalo.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVSup port upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:22:20 -0000 --=-zsbw0pdLrDQQWozhB5bO Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 13:47 -0800, John Polstra wrote: > The fix for the bug is in the cvsupd server. Lots of people > would appreciate it if you'd upgrade your cvsup installation to > "cvsup-16.1h_2" (or the cvsup-without-gui port with the same > revision). The three machines I more or less watch over: cvsup{5,8,18}.freebsd.org/cvsup{9,18}.us.freebsd.org cvsup9.freebsd.org cvsup10.{us.}freebsd.org should be all set. I'll do cvsup-master some time soon, given its clients this bug shouldn't be biting any of them (mostly just mirror sites). That first one on the list could still use a little help... It's what I point existing names at when a site disappears on us. Of the names it's currently supporting we could use: 1) Two new sites in the USA to take over cvsup{9,18}.us.freebsd.org 2) Two sites anywhere in the world to take over=20 cvsup{8,18}.freebsd.org. For (2) we would be looking for already existing sites that have a large-ish server set up for it but you feel it is currently severely under-utilized. We would like the servers in the TLD to be established sites with a good track record, good network connectivity, and capable of handling a fairly significant load. Based on observing the three machines I watch over it's best if the machine have 1Gb to 2Gb of RAM and, if possible, SCSI disks (SCSI disks is less important if it's got 2Gb memory). With that the machine can typically handle 15 to 25 simultaneous clients and still remain "responsive" (meaning it doesn't take forever for each client to finish its updates). With less than 1Gb RAM the servers tend to become *severely* I/O bound. If you'd like to volunteer for any of the above let me know. :-) =09 --=20 Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel | --=-zsbw0pdLrDQQWozhB5bO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCSXKm/G14VSmup/YRAvx7AJ0fFo2eimyRUMNwvGg79lyxqMyfbgCfXyBr HJKfhXwKTdZ9ONi58iDPrGY= =vVrW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zsbw0pdLrDQQWozhB5bO--