From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 16 22:13:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2A516A41F for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 22:13:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mail2.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9923843D6D for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 22:13:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 20135 invoked by uid 399); 16 Dec 2005 22:13:36 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Dec 2005 22:13:36 -0000 Message-ID: <43A33C0E.9050100@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:13:34 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, simon@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Should etc/rc.d/ike move to ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 22:13:38 -0000 Howdy, Because it was previously not possible to run scripts for ports in the base rcorder, and because the rc.d/ike script needed to run well before localpkg, it was imported into the base, and lives currently in /etc/rc.d. However, now that I am about to MFC the code that runs ports scripts in the base rcorder, I'm wondering if we shouldn't add the rc.d script to the port, and remove it from HEAD and RELENG_6 after my MFC. I would of course be glad to assist with any details related to the move. Any thoughts? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection