From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 16:41:04 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC13D039E6 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "0x20.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 DV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2486991A; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:41:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B4446E0081; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:41:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id v28GexFV060473; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:40:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id v28Gexwe059274; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:40:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:40:59 +0100 From: Lars Engels To: Matthew Seaman Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? Message-ID: <20170308164059.GZ34495@e-new.0x20.net> References: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="apg+fY3UKMMABzWO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p35 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:41:04 -0000 --apg+fY3UKMMABzWO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:34:45PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 2017/03/08 16:04, Bob Willcox wrote: > > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read it= sounds > > like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. >=20 > Make that: all *NPAPI* plugins other than Flash are now unsupported. > That's stuff like the Java plugin or the OpenH264 Video Codec from Cisco > (which I seem to have installed and can no-longer remember why. Some > sort of video conference thing a long time ago). The OpenH264 plugin is shipped out of the box. --apg+fY3UKMMABzWO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJYwDQbXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1tR4UH/29jmw+WbdxVR8sL5yc0GAVw 8GBLdsw4GbaF2sReD+e77MDC20fEQYVkjgiKgDuIEP1CJOxoFi/PzukZ8lbasovd Iu7MffQY+vrA4tMWPdR+gRfNK87qLifnwR6iom53jXraU6TxLpWgpu4w7PiOP5gZ 26eH0365wno+kP1tMhh/otbiMEhuI+xBa/L5sWk4EEn18VQw7Sjt00bw2hIpo/dQ KTCyXflEoTLZ/pxzKz2sNQtM83w2YbFICd/P4vjYrlkr/0IcXICflpYXskWS1iU7 uf3hnT+pTCDqP+8hjoy83cxYIRBJA3lvWdblE9SbYg8s065XPQIrOKQHlwFpUVM= =JPLw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --apg+fY3UKMMABzWO--