From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 1 17:20:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A0116A4CE; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 17:20:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (wcborstel.demon.nl [82.161.134.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEB943D5C; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 17:20:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.chello.nl [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD3D813A; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 19:21:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.wcborstel.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32081-09; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 19:21:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.110] (unknown [192.168.2.110]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD5C80F6; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 19:21:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Jorn Argelo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 19:20:21 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <50335.81.84.175.12.1091365736.squirrel@81.84.175.12> In-Reply-To: <50335.81.84.175.12.1091365736.squirrel@81.84.175.12> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200408011920.28898.jorn@wcborstel.nl> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.domain.tld cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org cc: Hugo Silva Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.2.1 kernel w/ SMP under high load = panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:20:21 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 01 August 2004 15:08, Hugo Silva wrote: > I am running a Dual Xeon 2.8ghz w/ SMP, SCHED_ULE on FreeBSD > 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9. Why aren't you running FreeBSD 4.10 on a machine like that? 5.2.1 is simply= =20 NOT ready for production enviroments. Why do you think it's still considere= d=20 as unstable? Your panic is probably being caused by a bad driver, but of=20 course I can't tell you which one. So get in touch with your data centre and get 4.10 on that machine. It will= =20 probably solve most of your problems. Jorn =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBDSZXs2lBCry7iusRAjUlAKCqRB/BZ3invP1wxV0EcD/amkdGRACgjUtR 4JW+zZU9g1JZutwBECAfJJM=3D =3Da8U6 =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----