From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jun 27 10:46:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com [171.70.84.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A4537C13F; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:46:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@cisco.com) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) id e5RHjlj35989; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:45:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200006271745.e5RHjlj35989@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Mark Murray Cc: bmah@acm.org, markm@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD pgp2, pgp6, and exmh ports In-Reply-To: <200006270610.IAA54574@grimreaper.grondar.za> References: <200006262107.e5QL7F018997@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <200006270610.IAA54574@grimreaper.grondar.za> Comments: In-reply-to Mark Murray message dated "Tue, 27 Jun 2000 08:10:15 +0200." From: bmah@acm.org (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@acm.org X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1844123850P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:45:47 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --==_Exmh_1844123850P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Mark Murray wrote: > > I'm trying to figure out how to update the ports collection entry for > > mail/exmh2. One of the other exmh developers recently added support > > for PGP 6.5, and I'm trying to figure out how to make all these things > > work together in the ports collection. > > Cool! > > > Anyone have any suggestions as to how to deal with this? > > Is there an option you can use, like pgp --version? I'm not sure. exmh can detect and support multiple versions of PGP largely by checking for the existence of files. That's clearly not the only way to do it, but changing this means a little more thought. (There's an implicit assumption that we can locate the PGP executables by distinct names, which currently default to pgp, pgp5, gpg, and pgp6.) I'm tempted to send-pr the diffs for an exmh-2.2 ports patch the way they are now, and to fix up the PGP 6.5 support later. But I'm not sure if this is The Right Thing (TM) to do. Bruce. --==_Exmh_1844123850P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 iD8DBQE5WOhL2MoxcVugUsMRAoTDAKDI9TgjbvkyFAieHwWgJExcgvD7vACfUD7G KnwMMHqTTd7xkpyaBzxtrfk= =lGcG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1844123850P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message