From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Jun 23 13: 4:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B584D151C3 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 13:04:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA08246; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 22:04:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id WAA14341; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 22:04:43 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 22:04:43 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: Karl Pielorz Cc: Suresh Rajagopalan , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hardware RAID for FreeBSD Message-ID: <19990623220443.B13759@bitbox.follo.net> References: <3768164D.A67784B4@tdx.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: <3768164D.A67784B4@tdx.co.uk>; from Karl Pielorz on Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 10:25:33PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Jun 16, 1999 at 10:25:33PM +0100, Karl Pielorz wrote: > Suresh Rajagopalan wrote: > > Has anyone tried using the DPT storage manager for SCO under FreeBSD > > ibcs2's emulation? > > At a guess I'd say that the differences between SCO's drivers and ours would > probably squash this outright - the DPT manager software needs very low level > access to the DPT, and is probably tied to their driver... I'd be good if > someone proved me wrong though... :) The old DPT driver (pre-CAM) had the hooks to do this, though I'm not sure if they were tested. Justin deleted these during the CAM conversion, citing the CAM passthrough interface as an adequate substitute. This may be through a mis-understanding of their purpose, though. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message