From owner-cvs-all Tue Jun 22 3:37:24 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752B014FE6; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 03:37:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id MAA80081; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:36:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: Peter Wemm Cc: Tim Vanderhoek , Jean-Marc Zucconi , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern imgact_gzip.c References: <19990622004545.5E47875@overcee.netplex.com.au> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 22 Jun 1999 12:36:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: Peter Wemm's message of "Tue, 22 Jun 1999 08:45:45 +0800" Message-ID: Lines: 12 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Peter Wemm writes: > Of course, if we can easily create anon backed vnodes these days then the > whole thing should be pretty easy - imgact_gzip could just decode the data > into the vnode and then feed it back to the exec routines. What if you have two running instances? Would it make two uncompressed copies, or recognize the second as a copy of the first and use the same anon vnode? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message