From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 18 4:26:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B3437B479; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 04:26:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA22358; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:25:12 +0200 To: Jim Judd Subject: Re: picobsd build Message-ID: <971868312.39ed8898bc746@webmail.harmonic.co.il> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:25:12 +0200 (IST) From: Roman Shterenzon Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-small@freebsd.org References: <971790523.39ec58bbcffa0@webmail.harmonic.co.il> <39EC5CE8.7F0E9892@netrake.com> In-Reply-To: <39EC5CE8.7F0E9892@netrake.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Jim Judd?? : > I also had to define NONETGRAPH in 4.1 Release to get it to compile > successfully. > > jj > > Roman Shterenzon wrote: > > > Quoting "Brandon D. Valentine" : > > > > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Roman Shterenzon wrote: > > > > > > >The PicoBSD is broken a bit. > > > >Look for my patches that I sent to small if you can't build it or > use > > > it. > > > > > > Can someone tell me what all is involved in getting PicoBSD builds > > > working under RELENG_4 and point me to any uncommitted patches I > might > > > need? I'd like to get it working. Actually I don't even > necessarily > > > need PicoBSD working. Is there a way to build tinyware without > PicoBSD > > > mechanisms? I'd like to populate a filesystem image with > bootblocks, a > > > kernel, and the tinyware apps + a few others compiled from ports. > I'd > > > appreciate any pointers. > > > > I like the "build" mechanism more than "make" mechanism, or, > > maybe I just couldn't make "make" mechanism work. > > > > Search the mailing lists: -stable, -small. > > I've sent some patches. Maybe I'll open a PR when I come home. > > The problem is that no one seems to maintain it. > > Can you hear me, -stable? > > > > The problems: > > -Needs to define NOIPSEC for some tools to build. > > -There's no more "more", use less and ln less more > > -The /etc is compressed, either don't compress it, or remember > > to decomress it when booting and remember to compress it when > > using "update". > > -update script does something weird in order to set the device. > > just use "/dev/fd0" and that's it. > > > > These are the patches I've sent. I only worked with "net" flavor > > though. > > > > Something else I didn't fix: > > - missing /dev entries. > > > > I really like PicoBSD. I'm planning to use it as ipnat/ipfilter > > gateway when I'll finally get a cable connection. > > (Yes, you can even have syslogd in it) Perhaps someone will take the maintainership over PicoBSD? I've seen some reports in PR db which hang there for a really long time after being assigned to the -small maintainer. Don't let the baby demon die ! :) --Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant [ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message