From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 13 16:22:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F345E16A4BF for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 16:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lewis.lclark.edu (lewis.lclark.edu [149.175.1.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7C1E43F85 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 16:22:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: from [149.175.34.250] ([149.175.34.250]) by lewis.lclark.edu (SAVSMTP 3.1.1.32) with SMTP id M2003101316220525001 ; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 16:22:05 -0700 From: Eric Anholt To: Peter Wemm In-Reply-To: <20031013230504.C54F32A8DF@canning.wemm.org> References: <20031013230504.C54F32A8DF@canning.wemm.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1066087324.642.114.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 16:22:05 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86-4-clients port broken. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 23:22:08 -0000 On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 16:05, Peter Wemm wrote: > Eric Anholt wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 15:51, Peter Wemm wrote: > > > David Gilbert wrote: > > > > I don't really have a clue where to look for this fix as there seems > > > > to be a serious amount of magic going into the divided XFree86-4 port > > > > builds, but my XFree86-4-clients port fails saying: > > > > > > > > make: don't know how to make /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-clients/work/xc/exp > orts > > > /lib/libfntstubs.a. Stop > > > > > > I ran into this on my amd64 box too. Is yours an i386? > > > > This is a problem on ref5, too. I am testing a fix right now. The > > confusing part is I can't find any change I (or anyone else) has made > > that would have caused this. > > Does the port have any exposure to make(1) at all? Its been futzed with > fairly recently. I know it's supposed to use gmake, but perhaps there are > still some "make" references? No, actually it uses the system (bsd) make. It generally is pretty resistant to differences with different types of make, though. Testing a new idea for a fix that will cut the build time/space required, too. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org