From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 20 20:42:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07928106567E for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 20:42:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60ED08FC19 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 20:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87454 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2012 20:42:56 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:vbr-info:user-agent:cleverness; s=1559d.5032a150.k1208; bh=wmhzpAi7rlNOJS8LCtU2WMDOMWEva3RCjEPwGeGFlqY=; b=rcdkDBdX9srOfFuGGS6zvw7nfFass6wOeW7QUP5i29+0o95dsnh4cskWkrnTFwOr55ucyghbSgUgRDfNXuJGTFzuAQW8tOt0AeahlVjBpW0CZiLdjJSv+7CGMStDlKrAfibuJ5HR7D48iZyKoNdwTc122lxU76j9XAjZFM8c2Cs= VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org Received: (ofmipd 127.0.0.1); 20 Aug 2012 20:42:34 -0000 Date: 20 Aug 2012 16:42:56 -0400 Message-ID: From: "John R. Levine" To: "Odhiambo Washington" In-Reply-To: References: <20120820164613.77448.qmail@joyce.lan> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) Cleverness: None detected MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache 2.2 and php 5.4.5 failing on freebsd 8.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 20:42:58 -0000 >> Good thought, I just did that. Results: >> >> php5.3: works fine as far as I can tell >> >> php5.4: fails in random ways >> >> This suggests there is a bug in 5.4 which only is apparent on FreeBSD 8.x. >> I note that the packages for 8.x have gone away on the distribution server, >> so I expect they're not regression testing 8.x any more > > Packages?? > > It's better for you to use the ports tree! Ahem. If you will review the messages to which you were responding, you will note that yes, I did build everything from the ports tree. My point is that since they're not building 8.3 packages any more, they're not validating updated ports against 8.3 any more. R's, John