From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Mar 14 15:46:06 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA19451
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 14 Mar 1997 15:46:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA19446
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 1997 15:46:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.4/8.7.3) id PAA07857; Fri, 14 Mar 1997 15:44:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 15:44:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199703142344.PAA07857@vader.cs.berkeley.edu>
To: imp@village.org
CC: current@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <E0w5Yuc-0003xk-00@rover.village.org> (message from Warner Losh on Fri, 14 Mar 1997 08:28:54 -0700)
Subject: Re: libraries
From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * I can kill the 2.0 and 2.1 and life will be good, no?  Just wanting a sanity

Yes.  While you're there, move the 1.* libraries out of the way and
recompile everything that complains.  Then you can delete those
too. :)

Satoshi