Date: 02 Oct 2002 10:37:57 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> To: Marc Recht <recht@contentmedia.de> Cc: aztlanet@gmx.net, gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: GNOME 2.1 upgrade Message-ID: <1033569477.333.3.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <20021002104727.590f03a0.recht@contentmedia.de> References: <1033527725.295.11.camel@unxstar> <20021002104009.5a55baec.recht@contentmedia.de> <1033548212.1085.1.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <20021002104727.590f03a0.recht@contentmedia.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 04:47, Marc Recht wrote: > > This isn't going to happen anytime soon. We're shipping 4.7-RELEASE > > with 1.4.1 as the default GNOME desktop. The primary reasons being lack > Oh. Ok, then dropping 1.4.1 isn't that good idea.. :-) > > > of fully working I18N and most GNOME 2 apps are still beta at best. > Indeed. > > > I think doing -devel versions is the way to go if 2.1 is put into the > > tree. The downside of this is that there will be one more version of > > GNOME to support. > But, as you mentioned yourself, GNOME2 is beta. So, why not replacing the components with "official" beta versions? The GNOME 2 desktop is _release_ stable quality. The applications that have been ported to GNOME 2 are still beta at best. Joe > > Marc -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1033569477.333.3.camel>