From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 10 15:52:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D4AA8D for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:52:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@qxnitro.org) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C838FC12 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k10so1552279iea.13 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:52:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qxnitro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3kc8qg8PFaFYKPMJboyfSNU95/Kx6PwsdhYIKO/TlSk=; b=RAhFFqE5P17a122y3EZCrcxHFRKS6QSHeuOWA/FkWdJ8KP/QWAgLC+eNdDVcONEU0A I7Tqx8rmxXDjIVnUU0K3jHFhumQRZwG7YHaYI/ipveWu+KsN+hwri5fVpvGLdnrkE+9L rClkN6X2mzYFsyRIXpPGTX1LmSrqV3Mrp/H0c= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=3kc8qg8PFaFYKPMJboyfSNU95/Kx6PwsdhYIKO/TlSk=; b=Dfe8JEjZVS8f/XIYK7FXQnbxU158gHH4Sn4TsCtaFYfuTswF9bDWVqifHgobAsi8CL yqdhm4hb9r1KBcF3ueF0pR2/G5AiW2r/Ls3MMs8bYPZJIpA6WZfwVnCEPICoRU6mVjBr FySdSGkYZaMzAJI5/Wu310fN1As1QCqmiH/3Qt67ts/e3CzwNyp4DIfs0kQPEid7d9bQ B8Gbq+R/3E221E4JvMPF8vIj5LkzlGFlTFHqciDvqu1ba/crP28gyCg3b/5n8ZdWlGEp UZ/X3ZHZXx4Z0kJTZDRXYu4f/GOzCw/eAI18lTk4EVLYBcQweVyc34YZ5K2UwK0kYAHP 3KJw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.169.100 with SMTP id ad4mr5733041igc.50.1349884365920; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.51.40 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:52:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [2620:0:1040:201:20b6:7d01:998e:97b] In-Reply-To: <20121010134421.GI26497@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20121010134421.GI26497@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:52:45 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng From: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" To: Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnWv2qMWm3iNiCB0294KI7q0JIS/dW5XNcQ2CsDEXEaKR68L2uoKv+H1bQxkPed3pH1/GsQ X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:07:26 +0000 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, ports-announce@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:52:47 -0000 On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > If you are using the ports tree on a FreeBSD current setup, then you are > concerned by the announce. > > As nvidia-drivers has been fixed and is now properly working with pkgng, the > ports tree as been switch by default to use pkgng on FreeBSD Current based on > version >= 1000017 which was the version when we tested the switch code. > > Make sure to read UPDATING (from ports) to correctly migrate your system or find > instruction to make your system still running with legacy pkg_install tools. I read UPDATING, but I'm still not sure what this means when I use ports and not packages. Does it mean that I should install pkg to have /var/db/pkg managed, but otherwise ports keeps working the same way, or? -- Simon L. B. Nielsen