From nobody Sat Dec 4 15:14:40 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF18F18CBA9D for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2021 15:14:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f44.google.com (mail-io1-f44.google.com [209.85.166.44]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J5tXc22Lnz3j73 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2021 15:14:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f44.google.com with SMTP id q72so2946655iod.12 for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2021 07:14:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0XAIR5pC3mg7NJgR1z/otRmqAe/Jwk9xx+jfC0w/Rnw=; b=pql6zBD1DhxxRwwb6s2ir0x3QWLKKKwdtJxdugv7YQ+FVXYC6MI76+63jsKgkLDqYA nuCW8RpdFcCVQqYJ4WqqJ/EHrhEJ7p3rJ+WGOsXa1dDDQRtaieNGzFZvE0HEMvckBw/l azBF6ScEHMkKqeRVVakf8rVkxp6ib0n150bEDJIYv9hxcKnVH7cjYRnfDvQZJ43U5VjS UYq6GrEgETcH8ghlWyG+JSHb9l5MpanMPe8I/thBJBMhRhoOxN/+6VsLoacZ3lyVRu3D ZRSwwSv2JYETxzce5zxliHHYlDhi2xgJZI0Yll4DsY9bhqKCaYP4GX9A9fFyTtzxU9Sy o5FQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533wVQhlEX+hHz0NVWAflP1HxZ3UQTzeNBbY39SWT0SqHNKTWJNs I1ClkxQgYyQ8tUX9aavbkU4Ca0SUdbaVYE1WLzA4TK+rSew= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfspEZKfehXlAz/Kcl5xNrT3ER5+IDeVrmb5AuhaZUX0Yh4kEpAew9kISsTknqI8qUy4mzinobD7FO4+J5tkA= X-Received: by 2002:a02:6064:: with SMTP id d36mr30644707jaf.80.1638630895629; Sat, 04 Dec 2021 07:14:55 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6393FE15-8839-42D2-B012-6EA2AF671F9C.ref@yahoo.com> <6393FE15-8839-42D2-B012-6EA2AF671F9C@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <6393FE15-8839-42D2-B012-6EA2AF671F9C@yahoo.com> From: Ed Maste Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 10:14:40 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: amd64 main [so: 14]: recent bulk builds are reporting: pid ??? comm conftest has trashed its stack, killing To: Mark Millard Cc: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4J5tXc22Lnz3j73 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.44 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.61 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[carpeddiem]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.166.44:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.61)[0.608]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.166.44:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 at 06:23, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote: > > I do not remember the output from poudriere builds having reports > like the following before: > > pid 35298 comm conftest has trashed its stack, killing > . . . > pid 36773 comm conftest has trashed its stack, killing This message used to be a printf() hidden behind #ifdef DEBUG but became a uprintf() in 2e79a216329f (Sept. 16, 2021). So the behaviour hasn't changed, it's just now being reported.