From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 29 10:11:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE4516A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:11:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao07.cox.net (lakemtao07.cox.net [68.1.17.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7BA43FA3 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:11:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.11]) by lakemtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20031029181122.IGI21605.lakemtao07.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:11:22 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:10:37 -0600 To: Kent Stewart References: <20031029042715.57311.qmail@web60301.mail.yahoo.com> <20031029155727.GD15764@hal9000.halplant.com> <200310290815.36608.kstewart@owt.com> From: Jeremy Messenger Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200310290815.36608.kstewart@owt.com> User-Agent: Opera7.21/Linux M2 build 480 cc: Andrew J Caines cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INDEX-5 is deleted then reconstructed by "make index" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:11:23 -0000 On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:15:36 -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Wednesday 29 October 2003 07:57 am, Andrew J Caines wrote: >> Jeremy, >> >> > I don't think so, because you still have to wait for the databases to >> be >> > rebuilt, before you can use portversion. >> >> But since you will typically be cvsup'ing, building, updating dbs and >> such >> during `off hours', ie. not sitting in front of the terminal waiting for >> it to finish, the db rebuilds don't take any important time. >> >> I do it like this[1] >> >> I was surprised by your timing results: >> > # time portversion -l "<" >> > 3.127u 0.653s 0:08.02 47.0% 22+9776k 1003+0io 0pf+0w >> > # time pkg_version -l \< >> > 29.930u 11.442s 0:49.49 83.5% 327+540k 1093+0io 63pf+0w >> >> On my two FreeBSD boxes with up-to-date ports and built indices (portsdb >> -Uu; pkgdb -u), I get quite the opposite results: >> >> PII-266, 384MB, ports on old 4.5GB UW SCSI disk, 4.9-RC[2]: >> >> # time portversion -l "<" >> real 0m15.162s, user 0m6.556s, sys 0m1.407s >> # ttime pkg_version -l \< >> real 2m24.996s, user 1m45.382s, sys 0m28.736s >> >> P4-1700, 384MB, ports on newish 20GB ATA-5 disk, 5.1p10[3]: >> >> # time portversion -l "<" >> real 0m5.528s, user 0m1.027s, sys 0m0.407s >> # time pkg_version -l \< >> real 0m23.175s, user 0m10.967s, sys 0m7.034s >> >> > Result: The 'my' way is a winner, easier and quick. :-) >> >> So what is the major difference between your setup and mine? > > Wait till a change like the last upgrade to gettext comes along and you > have > to rebuild all of the ports that use it. He will have to rebuild each of > them > manually. You can use portupgrade recursively on gettext and wait for it > to > finish. Uh? No, I do not have to do it by manual. All I have to do is 'portupgrade -rf gettext -m BATCH=yes'.. It's about pkg_version and portversion; not portupgrade. ;-) Or, maybe I don't understand your point? Cheers, Mezz > Kent > >> >> > But, I don't know how it will make the difference if I have the 9,000 >> > packages installed. >> >> 231 installed on the PII, 188 on the P4, all built from ports. >> >> >> [1] http://halplant.com:88/software/FreeBSD/scripts/update_fbsd >> [2] http://halplant.com:88/systems.html >> [3] Find disk specs for the Optiplex GX400 on Dell's web site and win >> a prize for persistence in the face of crappy design and slow >> delivery. >> >> >> -Andrew- -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.