From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Nov 21 18:26:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from orvieto.eecs.harvard.edu (orvieto.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FB014F9B for ; Sun, 21 Nov 1999 18:26:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stein@eecs.harvard.edu) Received: from localhost (stein@localhost) by orvieto.eecs.harvard.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA05993; Sun, 21 Nov 1999 21:26:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from stein@eecs.harvard.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: orvieto.eecs.harvard.edu: stein owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 21:26:13 -0500 (EST) From: Christopher Stein To: FreeBSD Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dennis has a good point. > for slower? I've ran FreeBSD for years and now I run a combo of -STABLE > and -CURRENT and you know what? It's all good! My hardware is the bottle > neck and its just as fast as 2.x was. Do you have some numbers to back this up? (unfortunately "It's all good!" doesn't mean much to serious systems researchers). What benchmarks have you been running? chris stein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message