From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 20 17:44:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6FD106564A for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:44:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006B38FC17 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:44:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBF514.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.245.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q1KHiOUc094793; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:44:25 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q1KHiFAl045376; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:44:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1KHi3Ar010784; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:44:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201202201744.q1KHi3Ar010784@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Jerry McAllister From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:35:05 EST." <20120220163505.GA40690@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:44:03 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: One or Four? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:44:27 -0000 Jerry wrote: > So, the OP posted a question about normal and/or preferred use > of FreeBSD and people responded. Or do you consider this thread > to be too technical? Maybe the discussion could fit in Hackers. Yes, hackers@ Would have been a better choice. sysinstall@ Perhaps yet better, arch@ Perhaps might consider it too trivial for them. current@ If poster intended to get new code committed to current. For most topics on questions, that aren't of the "Help! I'm a struggling lost newbie" class, there's a range of lists tuned to topics. http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/