From owner-freebsd-doc Fri Oct 8 1:33:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from rucus.ru.ac.za (rucus.ru.ac.za [146.231.29.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C34114E0B for ; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 01:33:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nbm@rucus.ru.ac.za) Received: (qmail 30939 invoked by uid 1003); 8 Oct 1999 08:35:40 -0000 Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 10:35:40 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner To: Motoyuki Konno Cc: FreeBSD Documentation Project Subject: Re: Style Challenge! Message-ID: <19991008103539.B28390@rucus.ru.ac.za> References: <19991006152549.A33181@mithrandr.moria.org> <19991008002909.A8995@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> <199910080148.KAA37484@sakura.snipe.rim.or.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i In-Reply-To: <199910080148.KAA37484@sakura.snipe.rim.or.jp> Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri 1999-10-08 (10:48), Motoyuki Konno wrote: > I think the separate two stage commit is good *if* there are > no translations at all. > > Good Point: > o Easy to know the changes between two revisions. > o If some -doc translation team missed the style change > announce, two stage commit will help them. > > Bad Point: > o You must commit two times. But is it really a bad point? I'll do it in two, and stick to the rules. This was really just a feeler - now I think we can apply the rules in all cases, to build good habits. (actually, I have to redo the patches, since I newfs'd the wrong partition by mistake *grin*) Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@rucus.ru.ac.za To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message