From owner-cvs-all Mon Jul 17 0: 8:47 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132D937B8B0; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 00:08:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id AAA46899; Mon, 17 Jul 2000 00:08:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 00:08:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: "David O'Brien" Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/scripts dokern.sh In-Reply-To: <20000716202018.A87214@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 07:04:51PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > Do you know of any in 4.1-R that do? I've MFC'ed the lack of > > > /dev/random. > > > > Gack, you didn't MFC the new Yarrow did you? > > No. I MFC'ed the removal of "options RANDOMDEV" for BOOTMFS (if it is in > GENERIC). I do not know if any one was going to try to MFC the new > random code and thus brought this up. options RANDOMDEV was something Mark only added recently for -current. Anyway, my objection still stands about the effect on those packages. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message