From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Apr 24 04:31:20 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA10127
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 04:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ra.dkuug.dk ([130.225.204.52])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA10119
          Wed, 24 Apr 1996 04:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from sos@localhost) by ra.dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA07538; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 13:23:19 +0200
Message-Id: <199604241123.NAA07538@ra.dkuug.dk>
Subject: Re: Anybody playe with ip_filter ??
To: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp)
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 13:23:19 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: sos@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <10910.830344636@critter.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Apr 24, 96 11:17:16 am
From: sos@FreeBSD.ORG
Reply-to: sos@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In reply to Poul-Henning Kamp who wrote:
> 
> > > The present kernel interface to ipfw should fit ip_filter fine,
> > > and we should have no need to modify it further I think...
> > 
> > Super, who is going to do that & when :)
> 
> you, now ?  :-)

I didn't have to ask right :)


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Soren Schmidt             (sos@FreeBSD.org)             FreeBSD Core Team
               So much code to hack -- so little time.