From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jan 7 15:47:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA24714 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 15:47:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.96.120]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA24693 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 15:47:46 -0800 (PST) Received: (from msmith@localhost) by genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.2/8.7.3) id KAA11935; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 10:16:35 +1030 (CST) From: Michael Smith Message-Id: <199701072346.KAA11935@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Subject: Re: w problem In-Reply-To: <19970107220300.5821.qmail@suburbia.net> from "proff@suburbia.net" at "Jan 8, 97 09:03:00 am" To: proff@suburbia.net Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 10:16:34 +1030 (CST) Cc: shanee@rabbit.augusta.de, hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk proff@suburbia.net stands accused of saying: > > Was this utmp change entirely necessary? From now on, xf86 has to produce two > versions of its binary distribution, pre and post utmp mangle. No, they produce a single version linked against libutil. > It seems to me that a little more discussion could have gone into this. More than the 18 months or so that have already ensued? You've got to be kidding. -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@gsoft.com.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control. (ph) +61-8-8267-3493 [[ ]] Unix hardware collector. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[