Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:31:35 +0200
From:      Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Josef Karthauser <joe@freebsd.org>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>, fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: nullfs and named pipes.
Message-ID:  <20070215153135.GI39168@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20070215152259.GA2950@genius.tao.org.uk>
References:  <20070204023711.GA3393@genius.tao.org.uk> <20070215135750.GR64768@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20070215152259.GA2950@genius.tao.org.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--o7gdRJTuwFmWapyH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 03:22:59PM +0000, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 02:57:50PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> >=20
> > Note that all processes within a jail can only intefere with processes
> > from another jail or host as if they were on different machines.  This
> > means they can communicate through PF_INET for instance but not
> > PF_LOCAL.
> >=20
>=20
> You might think so!  However that's not what's going on here.
>=20
> The named pipe/nullfs issue is nothing to do with jails.  It's just
> that nullfs is broken with respect to named pipes as I've previously
> reported.  However with this patch:
>=20
>     cvs diff: Diffing .
>     Index: null_subr.c
>     =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>     RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/fs/nullfs/null_subr.c,v
>     retrieving revision 1.48.2.1
>     diff -u -r1.48.2.1 null_subr.c
>     --- null_subr.c 13 Mar 2006 03:05:17 -0000      1.48.2.1
>     +++ null_subr.c 14 Feb 2007 00:02:28 -0000
>     @@ -235,6 +235,8 @@
> 	    xp->null_vnode =3D vp;
> 	    xp->null_lowervp =3D lowervp;
> 	    vp->v_type =3D lowervp->v_type;
>     +       if (vp->v_type =3D=3D VSOCK || vp->v_type =3D=3D VFIFO)
>     +               vp->v_un =3D lowervp->v_un;
I'm wondering is some reference counting needed there ?
> 	    vp->v_data =3D xp;
> 	    vp->v_vnlock =3D lowervp->v_vnlock;
> 	    if (vp->v_vnlock =3D=3D NULL)
>=20

--o7gdRJTuwFmWapyH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFF1HzXC3+MBN1Mb4gRAjWqAKDbD0zmXgl9XH84olKNpGzCa4jUvQCg1wTj
PS5YUBnN+3ferD6fSsPKfAQ=
=5j5c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--o7gdRJTuwFmWapyH--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070215153135.GI39168>