From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 00:37:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2394B16A522 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 00:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4CC43D73 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 00:37:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id k490bIN7010179; Mon, 8 May 2006 20:37:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 20:37:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: John Birrell In-Reply-To: <20060509000928.GA81282@what-creek.com> Message-ID: References: <445FB11C.1000309@samsco.org> <20060508.174813.89129442.imp@bsdimp.com> <20060509000928.GA81282@what-creek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shared library version bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 00:37:24 -0000 On Tue, 9 May 2006, John Birrell wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 07:59:52PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> For libraries with symbol versioning, yes, that's the plan. >> To date, that's libc, libm, libthr, libpthread, and libthread_db. >> If other libraries become symbol versioned after 7.0 gets >> released, then those libraries will need another version >> bump. > > > This is a bit off-topic, but we need "mutex/rwlock held" functions > in libpthread. DTrace wants them. 8-) Are you sure you're not talking about mutex(9F) on Solaris ;-) I can see mutex_held in Solaris 10 /lib/libthread.so.1, but I don't see any rwlock_held or rwlock_owned. -- DE