From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 11 11:52:54 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB39516A418
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:52:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jhs@berklix.org)
Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC9613C44B
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:52:53 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jhs@berklix.org)
Received: from js.berklix.net (p549A5A13.dip.t-dialin.net [84.154.90.19])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by tower.berklix.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id lBBBqpTe011126;
	Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:52:52 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.org)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41])
	by js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lBBBrm5Q085228;
	Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:53:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.org)
Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost.js.berklix.net [127.0.0.1])
	by fire.js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lBBBrmYl001945;
	Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:53:48 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net)
Message-Id: <200712111153.lBBBrmYl001945@fire.js.berklix.net>
To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>
In-reply-to: <20071211004531.GB11140@kobe.laptop> 
References: <fjho0k$hdc$1@ger.gmane.org> <20071210002131.GA74729@kobe.laptop>
	<002801c83b05$56ab20b0$3a2a13ac@staff.ktc.lan>
	<20071211004258.GA11140@kobe.laptop>
	<20071211004531.GB11140@kobe.laptop>
Comments: In-reply-to Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>
	message dated "Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:45:31 +0200."
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:53:48 +0100
From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.org>
Cc: Reko Turja <reko.turja@liukuma.net>, rrs@freebsd.org,
	freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7 trivial problems / notes 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:52:54 -0000

Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > Does the following look ok?
> A more complete patch, touching GENERIC for all architectures would be
> like the following patch, of course:

Looks good, it would be nice if someone commited that.
   ( I too got bitten by SCTP, when commenting out INET6 (which
     I didnt want, while leaving in SCTP for later removal, as I
     didnt know if something else new might depend on SCTP).

Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey. Munich Consultant: BSD Unix Linux. http://berklix.com
	Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz. Dump cigs 4 snuff.