Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 14:54:33 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) To: mph@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/7495 Message-ID: <199808072154.OAA23142@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <199808061801.LAA17607@freefall.freebsd.org> (message from Matthew Hunt on Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:01:12 -0700 (PDT))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* - Removed x11 from CATEGORIES line; it only needs to be there if * the port would logically fit into /usr/ports/x11 (which is being * split up, anyway). As of yesterday or so, USE_X11=yes is the * way to say a port needs X libraries. I've got an impression that reusing the USE_X11 variable was a bad idea. For things that were already in the tree, it was a simple renaming, but when we have new ports coming in with USE_X11, it might be too much trouble to check if it's actually USE_X11 or it means USE_X_PREFIX. How about we change the name of this variable before it's used? (I can even add a check in bsd.port.mk to print a warning if it's defined.) What do people think about USE_XLIB or USE_LIBX? Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808072154.OAA23142>