From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 13 10:29:32 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA15040 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 10:29:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA15035 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 10:29:30 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA08718; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 11:24:21 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199603131824.LAA08718@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: new malloc/libc... To: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp) Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 11:24:21 -0700 (MST) Cc: erich@lodgenet.com, brandon@tombstone.sunrem.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <22360.826734831@critter.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Mar 13, 96 04:33:51 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The malloc in 2.1 doesn't do >anything< to conserve memory, a fact than > can easily be confused with a memory leak. > > phkmalloc is >not< in 2.1. Poul-Henning's law: A sufficiently primitive malloc is indistinguishable from a memory leak. I want credit in your memoirs. 8-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.