From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 16 21:16:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C041916A4CE for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:16:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DF043D54 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:16:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rob@pythonemproject.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-67-169-203-186.client.comcast.net[67.169.203.186]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004111621165601400ge58ee> (Authid: europax); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:16:56 +0000 Message-ID: <419A6ED9.9030301@pythonemproject.com> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:19:21 -0800 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <419A7FC3.30900@optusnet.com.au> <20041116172445.GA14385@kayjay.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20041116172445.GA14385@kayjay.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: What OS are you? fun X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rob@pythonemproject.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:16:57 -0000 Karel J. Bosschaart wrote: >On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 07:39:13AM -0700, Dan MacMillan wrote: > > >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Andrew Sinclair >>>Sent: November 16, 2004 15:32 >>>To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org >>>Subject: Re: What OS are you? fun >>> >>>By the way, speed of light in the other thread is way off. The "accepted >>>constant" is bogus. The average speed is actually closer to 2.4 million >>>kilometers per second. >>> >>> >>You'd better cite your source and / or reasoning, as ~3*10^8m/s =is= the >>accepted constant speed of light in vacuum. >> >> > >Yes indeed. Also, the word 'average' makes the statement pretty >meaningless without specifying how the averaging is done (different >materials I think?). > >Karel. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > OK, I'll bite on this. Check www.nist.gov. They occasionally update the fundamental physical constants, but we are talking about incredibly small amounts. Rob.