From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 21 01:38:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3A3106564A for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 01:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from efinley.lists@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f172.google.com (mail-px0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AB68FC14 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 01:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi6 with SMTP id 6so2720126pxi.17 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:38:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=aneOTtqPJKJQ1bATEDJrCJascxbYlDiK1QgYfnlHB9s=; b=DZ+1o2vEUTW8+2T9AQrcGYOLS1vbGRMx2LNBbS7R5nS1LhnNF9F31uNr61nU9y8+gP E0XeGc4TwUgcSHVD0MGuhK0yOo1EFplllzp8q2b5XuhBDD201uKhBRHX2a7zX4O6svug 4e1u2hU2HifLSn4+xQamKGjXpFIK0cW5QCpnw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=m1EiQ3oap/Yo47hNjEOLOdagwoGtrekS0ZWXpaEVRIo4L7lQbAZ+VdT9P6MO0tWNOD Rn9w+3CHW7S8LxKDMcMqe9fpWm8t8sv4DgUM6WgDohO6IW9+69IUn5HbPxWGwoOPtMhU YE9BSrUdAQ2D4TfqI1wl07BqGA4t4/MM6hvVw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.54.231 with SMTP id m7mr1732596pbp.49.1303348160309; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.71.136 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:09:20 -0600 Message-ID: From: Elliot Finley To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: PF and NAT64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 01:38:51 -0000 Has the NAT64 code for PF been brought into -Current yet? Thanks, Elliot