From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 11 16:12:52 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F460E96680 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:12:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca", Issuer "CA_HLL_ISSUER_2016" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63A5E6C613 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:12:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03423623F1; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:12:51 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at harte-lyne.ca Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3XEGWfkbXIm8; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:12:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from webmail.harte-lyne.ca (inet04.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7242062460; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:12:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from 216.185.71.44 (SquirrelMail authenticated user byrnejb_hll) by webmail.harte-lyne.ca with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:12:48 -0500 Message-ID: <8706ecd1205493e8db739db69303c37c.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:12:48 -0500 Subject: Re: Boot issue after upgrade From: "James B. Byrne" To: "Paul Pathiakis" Cc: "Baho Utot" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-5.el6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:12:52 -0000 On Sun, December 10, 2017 22:00, Paul Pathiakis wrote: >> > Yes, CentOS compiles from RH, however, all the most recent ported > utilities come from cutting edge, not from RH.  It leads to > instability.  RH stays with stuff that has stabilized and had the > bugs shaken out.  They leave all of that to CentOS and Fedora before > incorporating to RH. > That statement is false. If you doubt me then send your claim as made above to Johnny Hughes and let us know what response you get. We are moving away from CentOS to FreeBSD. But that has to do with RedHat's desire to become the Linux incarnation of Microsoft and has nothing to do with the integrity of the CentOS team. CentOS is a binary reproduction of the corresponding RHEL release; saving only the copyright and trademark removals. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3