Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 18:02:59 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Ts'o" <dan@dna.tsolab.org> To: kiril@idea.co.uk (Kiril Mitev) Cc: pantzer@ludd.luth.se, keith@lightningweb.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Confusion Message-ID: <199903172303.SAA03336@dna.tsolab.org> In-Reply-To: <99031722310402.11541@loki.idea.co.uk> from "Kiril Mitev" at Mar 17, 99 10:27:42 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > This release is primarily aimed at developers and early-adopters, though > > many ISPs have reported good results when using it in production (not that > > we recommend this to any but the most highly skilled). See the release notes > > for more information. > > > > This is why you should upgrade to 3.1. > > WELL, exsqueeze me ... > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root 207 19 Jan 21 06:00 FreeBSD-stable -> > branches/3.0-stable > > So, which F-BSD version is -stable ? Please ? Don't get too pedantic here... there is a 3.0-stable branch and a 2.2-stable branch. Again, it was widely known and was obvious at the time of the 3.0-R that the 2.2-stable branch was far more STABLE. Even now, comparing 3.1R to 2.2.8R it seems clear that 2.2.8R is more stable -- how could it be otherwise ? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903172303.SAA03336>